Ride Lugged

Dropping down to Elder St, my favorite down hill!Yikes!Cross-trainingQuickbeam on zee trailTrail pandaI like this pic the best!ouch panda (and if you look closely, a "crooked bars" panda as well).JB @ Crafton HillsDropping into YucaipaGary 115!
Click to enlarge
A site about lugs, tan sidewalls, maybe jazz, classical, punk and bluegrass, local riding, worldly riding and people, cool cats, lame ducks, 110 bcds, wool, and smelling like hell after a long ride.

Fair and Balanced

November 01st, 2007 | Category: Uncategorized | Author: Johnson

I know this isn’t a political or even social commentary blog, but this bearing attention regardless:

“Federal law sets a mandatory minimum five-year prison sentence for trafficking in 5 grams of crack cocaine. It takes 500 grams of cocaine powder to warrant the same sentence. The crack-powder disparity has a strong racial dimension because more than four-fifths of crack cocaine offenders in federal courts last year were black.”

From a recent news clip…

Over a pound of coke for the same sentance?  That’s a grundle of coke.

6 Comments so far

  1. Nichols November 1st, 2007 7:37 pm

    SCOTUS just reviewed this issue and, moreover, the DOJ has held a number of hearings recently regarding adjusting the sentencing guidelines. If your interested, read the briefs from Kimbrough v. US (docket # 06-6330). The bigger problem, however, is the “non-binding”, yet still binding, sentencing guidelines in Fed. Ct.

  2. johnson November 1st, 2007 8:09 pm

    well i heard they are considering adjusting the sentancing for crack possession, shortening the sentance, but that still disregards the gross imbalance in drug quantity in relation to sentancing.
    way to comment on the blog, nichols. obv i need to bring more legalese into the conversation here.

  3. starmer November 2nd, 2007 11:43 am

    Casey, you are killing me. Remember Einstein’s theory of englishitivity:

    sentance isn’t a word

  4. starmer November 2nd, 2007 11:52 am

    Sorry, I realize that might be too much computerese for some of you. != means not equal.

  5. Nichols November 2nd, 2007 3:22 pm

    Update: the DOJ lowered the crack sentencing guidelines. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15885119&ft=1&f=1001 (no hyperlink here).

    There are, however, good reasons for the disparity. Foremost among them being, lawyers do coke, not crack. We have to be tough on drugs, just not the drugs the lawmakers may partake in now and again.

  6. new computer != remembering username (Sean) November 5th, 2007 7:17 pm

    Get tough on drugs? Why? Do we want people to stop taking drugs? Legalize drugs - all of ‘em and tax the shit out of them like they’re cigarettes or gasoline…or…legalize them and secretely infuse ipecaq into everything so drugs will make people so sick they’ll stop using them…or give them enough drugs to thin out the population a little…or something.

Leave a reply

Mexico